← Back to Architecture Explorer

Structured Sustainability Statements

Presentation and disclosure layer defining structural formats for sustainability reports, annexes, and statement formats without including sample disclosures or illustrative metrics.

Version: 1.0

Purpose

SSS establishes the structural framework for presenting sustainability disclosures in formal, structured formats including the main disclosure document and supporting annexes, while strictly avoiding instance data, example values, or illustrative content.

Constraints

Relation to CDI

SSS provides the presentation format for information intended by CDI disclosure slots. SSS handles how disclosures appear; CDI defines what categories of information belong in disclosures. This separation ensures presentation can evolve independently of disclosure intent architecture.

Non-Goals

Structural Formats

SSS-FORMAT-DISCLOSURE-STATEMENT

Structured Disclosure Statement

Main presentation document format for sustainability disclosures, organized into defined sections without prescribing specific content.

Header Section

Entity identification, reporting period, boundary definitions

Field Types: Reference to CERM element types, not actual values

Metric Tables

Structured tables for metric presentation

Note: Table defines column structure only
SSS-FORMAT-TRANSITION-ANNEX

Transition & Target Annex

Supporting document format for target definitions, trajectory disclosures, and transition pathway presentations.

Target Summary Table

Overview of all targets with structural references

Note: Columns define structure, no example targets

Trajectory Detail Table

Time-series structure for target pathways

Note: Columns define structure, no example pathways

Versioning Rules

Governance Positioning

Authority: Canonical ESG Technical Committee defines SSS structural formats
Structural Integrity: SSS must preserve formal separation from instance data and example content

Review Criteria

  • Does the format include any sample values or example data?
  • Does the format properly reference CERM element types without instantiation?
  • Does the format maintain separation from CDI disclosure intent definitions?
  • Is the table structure complete and unambiguous?
  • Is versioning properly incremented for structural changes?